The petition was first filed in the Supreme Court
The court said, “Initially, the defendant on the information on the information is called for some time to receive the instructions.” Earlier, the petitioner had also filed a petition in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court considered the request as a memorandum in 2020. The court had said that the relevant ministries could consider it. Now the petitioner has filed a petition in the High Court. They demand that the officers decide their memory.
What is the request of the applicant?
The petition states that the applicant has no choice but to knock the door of this court through a petition, as there is no refreshment by the defendants about a decision made on the applicant’s memorandum. Is The applicant argues that the name of ‘India’ does not represent the country’s culture and traditions. By turning this name into ‘India’, citizens will get rid of the ‘colonial burden’. The petition calls for amendment to Article 1 of the Constitution. This article belongs to the union’s name and the region.
The discussion of the Constituent Assembly was also mentioned in 1948
The petition also mentions the debate of the constituency in 1948. This debate took place on Article 1 of the then constitution. The petition states that even at that time the name of the country was demanded by the name of India or India. The petition states, “However, the time has come for them to recognize their original and authentic name, India, especially when the names of our cities have been converted into identity according to Indian morals.”
The applicant believes that the names of many cities have been turned into Indian culture, as well as the name of the country should be changed. This change will reveal the country’s true identity.
. (T) Court News (T) Court (T) Legal News
