Why Hindus and Muslims are saying their victory over the law of dedication, why they understand the court’s decision. Trending Global News

On the dedicated amendment Act 2025, the Supreme Court has given 7 days to respond to the central government. But the dedicated amendment Act 2025 has not been banned. There will be no new meeting in the dedicated board, dedicated board for these 7 days. The central government has assured that unless the case is heard, the dedicated board has assured that no non -Muslim appointment in the dedicated Parshad.

Earlier, the central government had assured the Supreme Court that ‘dedicated by the user’ or ‘dead bodies’ properties would not be identified until the next hearing. That is, it will not be dedicated.

A bench of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar and Justice KV Vishwanathan also assured by the Center by the Solicitor General Taser Mehta that no appointment would be made in the Central Waqf Parishad and Boards.

The Supreme Court said that the petitioners could file a reply on the center’s reply within five days, after which the matter would be filed for the interim order. Now the case will be heard on May 5.

Solicitor General Taser Mehta said the government would not identify the characteristics of “dedicated by dedicated” and “by the user” until the next hearing.

The CJI said that if the familiar property has been registered under the last 1995 Act, these properties cannot be made unclear until the next hearing on May 5.

The Center has assured the Supreme Court that it will not identify the features of the user by dedicated ‘dedicated’ by dedicated until the next hearing. That is, the features that are received by the user by the WAQF board are dedicated, the names of the dedicated board are registered, the name of the dedicated board will not be identified. According to the order, all dedicated features, including the dedicated bio -user, will be saved by the next date.

Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna said that all the lawyers have decided that 5 cases will be identified as a central matter and they will be considered as a lead case and these cases will be heard. The Supreme Court said that it is not possible to hear so many cases, so only 5 important objections will be heard.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court accepted the Center’s request for additional time to file a response in a dedicated law case.

Solicitor General Taser Mehta presented by the Center said that the preliminary response would be filed with the relevant documents within seven days. The court expressed satisfaction over the assurance of the Solicitor General that no appointment would be made in the dedicated board or council till the next hearing. The court also said that the current dedicated properties, including dedicated goodbye registration or dedication, will not be identified by notification.

The Solicitor General said that the Waqf Act is a well -thought -out law and has received a large number of applications about the center that classify the land as a dedication. He said that banning the entire act would be a drastic move and a week would be sought to respond.

The Supreme Court said that earlier it has considered some aspects of the law positive and reiterated that the law cannot be completely banned at this level. The court also said that it does not want any change in the current situation during the matter. The bench reiterated that its purpose is to maintain the current situation without any change, unless the matter is subject to a judicial review.

Both the Hindu side and the Muslim team are calling the court a victory.

Reacting to the decision, AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan said he was grateful to the Supreme Court, judges and supporters who helped us to protect the country beyond religion. Amanatullah Khan said, “We are satisfied with this decision because the central government had said in the court that the assets would be close to the dedication under the dedicated biger and there would be no interference with the members of the dedicated board. The central government will respond within 7 days.

On the Supreme Court decision, Congress MP Imran Pratap Garhi said he was grateful to the Supreme Court for the decision. He said, “The court raised almost all all matters in Parliament. Today’s decision shows that this law has been made against the constitution. It is a victory of the constitution, not of any party. The court will give more relief in the coming days and prevent the government’s land.”

At the same time, Baron Kumar Sinha, a lawyer for Hindu Army Chief Vishnu Gupta, said that in the Supreme Court today, the Solicitor General of India has clearly stated that no appointment will be made in the dedicated party or board under the new Amendment Act. The Solicitor General also said that the government would not reject the dedicated consumer who is registered and given till the next hearing.

Supreme Court hearing on dedicated law!
Government has 7 days of time, stagnation until the answer #Acquaintance #Atvideo #Supremecourt | @Hemansho_tage Sanjoomewati @Scrab_Rhul pic.twitter.com/huwdNRTX3

– Ajit (AAJTAK) April 17, 2025

He said that assets could be processed that are not registered and not registered.

Baron Kumar Sinha said that this means that the remaining provisions of the Waqf Act 2025 will be effective. He said that the government has tried to balance between the two sides so that no party can feel biased. The government has decided that it is not against anyone.

He said that in addition to these two provisions, the Supreme Court has approved the Waqf Act 2025.

Raina, a Hindu party lawyer, said that if we look at the inheritance, the Supreme Court has passed the law. He said that the court has banned the registration of the properties which have been notified or registered. Here, it has to be understood which verbal statement was dedicated by the user. Today, the Supreme Court has canceled it. This is a victory for the Hindu aspect.